About Air and Water

Showing posts with label Barnett Shale. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Barnett Shale. Show all posts

Wednesday, July 14, 2010

Energy needs to provide industry leadership in Barnett Shale

By MITCHELL SCHNURMAN - Fort Worth Star Telegram - July 14, 2010

Devon Energy Corp. works the Barnett Shale the right way. It's the biggest natural gas producer in the region and at the same time has become an industry leader on the environment.

With several initiatives, Devon, based in Oklahoma City, has cut greenhouse gases, limited emissions and recycled more than 400 million gallons of water used in "fracking" wells. Over the past decade, it has won numerous awards for its efforts, which boosted the bottom line as well as the environment.

On older wells, Devon is replacing one part -- a valve about the size of a pinkie finger -- that costs $300 and lets the company capture more gas and rack up carbon credits. One valve cuts methane emissions by 90 percent, which is the equivalent of taking 16 cars off the road.

No one doubts that Devon is a big believer in such initiatives. But last month, Devon wrote the state comptroller to oppose a bill that would require the valve replacements.

Devon also opposed a proposal for "green" well completions, even though it uses the technique on the vast majority of its Barnett Shale wells -- and the process generated $38 million in extra revenue in 2007.

Devon also shot down a call for vapor recovery units for storage tanks and the prospect of replacing combustion engines with electric motors.

The big hang-up? Devon wants the changes to be voluntary , not mandatory.

"There are spots where the technology works and spots where it doesn't," says Darren Smith, a manager of Devon's environmental, health and safety department. "Mandate these activities, and there can be a real business disruption."

In its letter, Devon said the mandates on emissions would ultimately hurt capital investment. It warned of fewer wells and jobs, lower taxes for cities, smaller royalties for residents and the risk that gas companies would shift operations.

Reciting that litany of unintended consequences is a business reflex whenever government proposes more regulation. But it's dismaying that Devon is falling back on that playbook, because right now, the industry needs leaders that will set the bar high -- not just for their companies but for every player.

After the BP spill in the Gulf of Mexico, everybody knows that you can't rely on voluntary compliance for anything. Before that, we had the meltdown on Wall Street, the mortgage lending debacle, the never-ending buildup of housing inventory. All drove home a message that no less an economic authority than Alan Greenspan later articulated: Companies will sacrifice a lot, even their future, for a quick buck.

Closer to home, in the Barnett Shale, there have been reasons to lose faith, too -- or at least to insist that any trust be verified. Several communities, led by the small town of Dish, have said residents are suffering ill effects from the gas business.

Yet state regulators consistently say all is well. This year, the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality lost much of its credibility when it told the Fort Worth City Council that the air was safe -- and failed to disclose that it later learned that three air samples scored high for benzene, a cancer-causing agent.

Follow-up tests showed that contaminant levels fell, but the commission never shared the complete information with city or state leaders. The test results came to light because of an internal complaint and fraud investigation, which was revealed by Forrest Wilder at the Texas Observer.

The disclosure enraged state Sen. Wendy Davis, D-Fort Worth, who had met with the commission's top officials repeatedly and never heard a hint about a discrepancy. Now she may introduce a bill to make it a crime for public officials to withhold information that affects public health.

Fort Worth and Dish are pursuing their own air quality tests because residents don't have confidence in the state's results. Meanwhile, the Environmental Protection Agency is also wading in. Wilder reported that environmentalists had pleaded with the EPA to intervene in Texas issues because the state agency was far too cozy with industry.

The clash between the state and the feds was on display last week when the EPA held a huge public meeting in Fort Worth to hear residents' stories about gas drilling. An EPA study is focusing on water issues in fracking, but the EPA's Dallas office is also looking into air quality.

The day before, Gov. Rick Perry pre-empted the EPA event by launching a Texas initiative on energy. He's pulling together university programs and experts to study the Gulf, gas drilling and more. Perry wants industry to underwrite the program, unbothered by the conflict that creates.

How low is the trust factor in the Barnett Shale? It says a lot when separate government entities -- the environmental commission, the EPA and individual cities -- are spending taxpayer money on the same thing.

In this setting, gas companies can't hew to the "voluntary, not mandatory" line, not if they hope to win public support. Devon may have the money and wherewithal to adopt eco-friendly policies, but others don't.

The solution is not to let companies off the hook. Force them to figure out ways to meet higher standards.

"What Devon does is not the norm in the industry," says Ramon Alvarez, senior scientist at the Environmental Defense Fund in Austin. "That's why regulations are worth having -- to bring the whole industry along."

By design, Devon avoided drilling in Pennsylvania, New York and Colorado, where opposition emerged with a vengeance. That was a savvy business move, but the controversy has come home now.

So why not champion the solutions?

Mitchell Schnurman's column appears Sundays and Wednesdays. 817-390-7821



Read more in the Fort Worth Star Telegram:

Sunday, July 4, 2010

Denton, Johnson county residents blame drilling process for fouled well water

By Elizabeth Cambell and Aman Batheja - Fort Worth Star Telegram - July 1, 2010
When her well water took on an odd odor, Linda Scoma, who has lived near Crowley in rural Johnson County for 20 years, worried something might be wrong. Then her hair suddenly turned orange after she washed it, and she knew there was a problem.

Damon Smith of the Denton County town of Dish said the water flowing from his family's well, drilled in 2002, used to run clear and clean. Now, when he pours it into a glass, Smith regularly sees sediment floating in it.
Both suspect the same source of their problems: nearby natural gas drilling activities.
While most of the discussions about the environmental impact of natural gas drilling in the Barnett Shale have centered on air quality, questions are now being raised about its potential impact on water quality as well.
Drilling critics have expressed concern that a drilling process called hydraulic fracturing -- in which millions of gallons of water and sand laced with chemicals are pumped into the ground to free up natural gas -- has the potential to contaminate groundwater supplies.
Industry advocates counter that fracturing for Barnett Shale wells typically occurs more than a mile below underground aquifers that provide drinking water. Industry practice is to install multiple layers of pipe, known as casing, and cement inside the wellbore to isolate petroleum and chemicals from groundwater.
"You're talking about 6,000 feet of strata, rock and sand separating the fracturing in the shale and the fresh water table," said Ed Ireland, executive director of the Barnett Shale Energy Education Council. "There's not any case in Texas where hydraulic fracturing has damaged a water table."

The federal government may weigh in on the issue. The Environmental Protection Agency is launching a study of fracturing that is expected to focus on effects on groundwater supplies. Congress is also considering legislation that would increase regulation of hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, including forcing companies to disclose the chemicals used in the process.
After drilling began near Scoma's home, water tests detected increasing levels of chemicals used in the drilling process. The company that conducted the tests advised the Scomas not to drink the water, and they wash their clothes at a Laundromat because the couple says the water is discolored and has an oily sheen. They have sued the drilling company.
"I was embarrassed to go out in public because of my hair," Linda Scoma said.

At Smith's well, though, testing by the Texas Railroad Commission, which regulates drilling, found no high levels of toxic materials. Contaminants detected in the water were not at a level that would violate state or federal water quality standards, officials said.
"Therefore, we would not expect any adverse health effects after ingestion of water with these concentrations," Railroad Commission spokeswoman Stacie Fowler said.

If that's true, Smith has an offer for the commission and anyone else who wonders if the water is OK.
"Come to my house. Drink a big glass of that water at my table," he said
.


Read more in the Fort Worth Star Telegram

Saturday, June 26, 2010

Texas Commission on Environmental Quality to consider Barnett Shale in emissions plan, official says


PHOTO SPECIAL TO THE STAR-TELEGRAM/WILLIS KNIGHT
Sharon Wilson of Earthworks distributed what she called the "Mark III B.S. protection mask" to people attending the TCEQ meeting Thursday night at the Arlington City Council Chambers

BY BILL HANNA - Fort Worth Star Telegram - June 25, 2010
- billhanna@star-telegram.com
ARLINGTON -- State environmental regulators "absolutely" will consider Barnett Shale emissions as part of a new plan to bring North Texas into compliance with federal ozone standards, an official with the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality said Thursday night.
Susana Hildebrand, the agency's chief engineer, said "everything is on the table" to bring the nine-county region into compliance with the 1997 EPA ozone standard of 85 parts per billion.
"We are particularly concerned about those emissions in Tarrant County," Hildebrand said. "I'm telling you, we are looking at those monitors. Our plan will look at those sites.
"
But most of the audience in the packed Arlington City Council chambers seemed skeptical.
Calvin Tillman, the mayor of the Denton County town of Dish, which has been a focal point in the testing of Barnett Shale emissions, said the agency is ignoring the natural gas industry as an ozone source.
"Are you here to protect the citizens, the people who came out here today, or are you here to protect large corporations?" Tillman asked. "Because frankly, I don't know whose side you're on."

Hildebrand responded that vapor recovery systems will be considered as part of the plan.
Industry praise
One of the few speakers not critical of the agency was Ed Ireland, executive director of the Barnett Shale Energy Education Council, an industry group. He praised TCEQ for installing air-monitoring systems and encouraged the agency to install more.
He said the air-monitoring sites in Dish and other locations have shown that the air near gas drilling sites is safe.
The EPA is in the process of reclassifying the Dallas-Fort Worth noncompliance area from moderate to serious. That will officially happen by Dec. 15.
The area's eight-hour ozone average for 2007, 2008 and 2009 was 86 parts per billion, placing it outside the 1997 standard.
The TCEQ will have a year to create a plan once the EPA reclassifies the area, and it will go into effect Dec. 15, 2013.
The EPA is also expected to rule by the end of August on the new standard, which will be between 60 and 70 parts per billion.
Even as the new standard is announced, the 1997 rules and deadlines will still apply, the EPA said.
Anthony Spangler, a spokesman for state Sen. Wendy Davis, D-Fort Worth, read a statement from Davis urging that selective catalytic reduction systems similar to one that will be installed on the Lafarge North American cement kiln in Illinois be used on Midlothian cement kilns.
According to Davis, the systems can reduce nitrogen oxides by 80 to 90 percent. Davis also urged the state agency to consider transporting salt water from oil and gas drilling operations through pipelines rather than diesel trucks.
BILL HANNA, 817-390-7698


Read more in the Fort Worth Star Telegram

Tuesday, June 15, 2010

Lawmakers respond to TCEQ Snafu

By Aman Batheju - Barnett Shale blog - Star Telegram - MAY 28, 2010
This week’s revelations regarding the air quality test results the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality presented to the city of Fort Worth drew plenty of responses from elected officials.

The state agency gave inaccurate results about toxic emissions from gas wells to the Fort Worth City Council in January and when it realized the error, failed to notify the city or the public for weeks.

John Sadlier, the agency's deputy director, has said the agency has learned from the mistake.

We have the responses from Gov. Rick Perry and Democratic challenger Bill White on our Politex blog.

Here's what other elected officials had to say:


State Sen. Wendy Davis, D-Fort Worth:
Davis filed a wide-ranging open records request with TCEQ today including for all files and e-mails related to the Dec. air testing in Fort Worth.

"I want the TCEQ to turn over all documents pertaining to the air testing the Barnett Shale arena so that we can determine the level at which the TCEQ has been dishonest with the public," Davis said in a statement. "The TCEQ must be transparent and held accountable to the taxpayers, and we cannot allow an agency to play fast and loose with the health and safety of our communities."


Davis said Thursday that she wants to introduce legislation that would make it a crime for public officials to withhold information that could affect public health. She met with high-level officials at the environmental agency from January to March to discuss air pollution problems, but no one mentioned the problems with the previous tests.

"It is only because of the fraud complaint filed by a concerned individual that these disturbing developments about dangerous benzene exposures have been revealed," Davis said in a statement.


State Rep. Marc Veasey, D-Fort Worth:

The three elevated testing sites appeared to all be in Veasey's district In a letter to the environmental agency's leadership, Veasey said its handling of the issue was "unacceptable."

"If public safety had been the TCEQ's primary concern, it would have recognized that subsequent testing showing potential problems should have been immediately reported to the media, local officials, and the general public," Veasey wrote.


He also wrote that he plans to ask Fort Worth to consider ceasing all drilling activity "in the immediate areas of concern until further testing can be done to ensure that residents of my district and their families are safe."

State Rep. Kelly Hancock, R-North Richland Hills:


Hancock said the criticism of the agency is overblown because it attempted to rectify the situation by doing the second round of tests.

"I think the key point to remember is, in February, the sites were retested, and they all came back significantly below the long-term exposure limits," Hancock said.


Hancock, a vice president at a chemical company, said he didn't understand why the agency bothered to retest the older samples in the air canisters.

"Actually the second tests were very unscientific," he said. "The canisters they used had been sitting on the shelves for a long time. ... If the tests had come back at lower levels, then everyone who's complaining now would want to throw those tests out."

Dish Mayor Calvin Tillman:

Tillman wants an outside investigation by the U.S. Justice Department or Congress.

"It's obvious they're not going to hold themselves accountable," he said. "These guys are just straight up lying to the public."


-Aman Batheja


Read more: http://startelegram.typepad.com/barnett_shale/2010/05/lawmakers-respond-to-tceq-test-snafu.html#ixzz0qxgP9mb7

Wednesday, April 14, 2010

Arlington considers tigher rules for gas-drilling

ARLINGTON -- With natural-gas drilling on the rise, the Planning and Zoning Commission will look at higher road-damage fees, tighter time limits and other measures to buffer the industry's impact on the city.


The commission meets in a 4 p.m. work session today at City Hall, 101 W. Abram St., to consider what would be the third major revision of the 2003 gas well ordinance.


The commission plans to vote next week on final recommendations to the City Council.


"This is one of the main drilling hubs in the Barnett Shale," Mayor Robert Cluck said.


"There is more urban drilling now. We're closer to structures -- homes, churches -- than we ever have been."

The city has received 210 permit applications since 2006, when its first seven wells were drilled. The city so far has approved permits for 163 wells, of which about 130 have been drilled, said Darren Groth, Arlington's gas well inspector. The increase in drilling points to the need for further strengthening of the ordinance, he said.



Read more: http://www.star-telegram.com/2010/04/13/2112329/arlington-considers-tighter-rules.html#ixzz0l6AS5Kyz

Friday, September 25, 2009

Saturday, June 20, 2009

Barnett Shale rights of way bill among 37 vetoed by Perry

By Dave Montgomery - Fort Worth Star-Telegram - June 19, 2009

AUSTIN — Gov. Rick Perry on Friday vetoed 37 bills passed by the 2009 Legislature, including a measure that would have allowed natural gas pipelines in the Barnett Shale to be routed along state rights of way.

Perry also struck down a major expansion of pre-kindergarten programs sponsored by state Rep. Diane Patrick, R-Arlington, along with bills sponsored by two other House members from Tarrant County. Sunday is the deadline for Perry to deal with legislation.

Perry signed the nearly $182 billion budget to run the state for the next two years. But he cut $288.9 million through line-item vetoes, mostly appropriations for bills that were either vetoed or failed to make it through the Legislature.

The budget includes $5 million that will allow the University of Texas at Arlington’s School of Nursing to establish a regional nursing education center. The program intends to double the number of undergraduate nursing students from 400 to 800 by 2012, according to a university news release. The appropriation was sponsored by state Sen. Chris Harris, R-Arlington.

"I am proud of the accomplishments lawmakers made this session and thankful for their solid leadership," Perry said. "However, there was some legislation that, in its final form, would have done more harm than good to our citizens."

Barnett Shale

In vetoing the Barnett Shale bill sponsored by state Sen. Wendy Davis, D-Fort Worth, Perry said he agreed that the measure "would provide a benefit to communities and reduce the impact on private property owners." But, he said, the measure, Senate Bill 686, conflicted with a similar bill he signed into law that permits gas corporations to lay and maintain lines under public rights of way.

Davis’ bill was a top priority for Fort Worth during the legislative session and was aimed at easing disruptions in residential areas as a result of natural gas drilling.

On Friday night, Fort Worth City Councilman Jungus Jordan said city officials would review the bill Perry referred to — House Bill 2572 — to determine whether the city could use it to meet its goal of routing natural gas pipelines away from residential neighborhoods.

"We’re going to have to sort through it," said Jordan, saying the city’s fundamental objective is to accommodate "the need for pipelines without interfering with the quality of life in neighborhoods."

Perry said HB 2572 "accomplishes the same objectives statewide while ensuring that pipelines are installed using the highest safety standards."

Pre-kindergarten

Patrick’s bill would have created a grant program to enable eligible school districts to implement or continue full-day pre-kindergarten programs.

Perry said that a similar grant program exists and that the $25 million appropriated for Patrick’s bill could be used to dramatically increase the number of students served through the program.

Passage of the bill was a major legislative accomplishment for Patrick, a former teacher who served on the Arlington school board. She could not be reached to comment Friday night.

The Texas Public Policy Foundation, a conservative think tank, applauded Perry’s veto, saying it would have created "an additional and unnecessary government" pre-kindergarten program.

Tarrant County reps

Reps. Marc Veasey, D-Fort Worth, and Todd Smith, R-Euless, also lost bills to Perry’s veto pen.

Smith was the sponsor of House Bill 3148 that would have allowed certain defendants to petition a judge for an exemption from registering as a sex offender. The legislation would have applied only to age-based offenses involving consensual sex in which the defendant was no more than four years older than a victim who was at least 13 years old.

Smith, a lawyer, said the bill was designed to protect teens and young adults engaged in consensual sex from being branded as sex offenders. But Perry said the bill "fails to adequately protect young victims."

Veasey’s bill, House Bill 3481, would have permitted criminal records to be expunged in cases in which no charges resulted from an arrest or investigation. In vetoing the bill, Perry said it "precipitates an untenable injustice to victims and a hazard to public safety."

Veasey said the veto was unwarranted. "I’m shocked," he said. "I thought this was a good chance to give innocent people back their names."

Other legislation

Perry has used a lighter hand with his veto pen this year. Shortly after his first session as governor in 2001, he set the known record for vetoes by a Texas governor with 83. He vetoed 49 bills after the 2007 legislative session.

Gov. George W. Bush had far fewer vetoes during his tenure. His highest total for a legislative session was 38 in 1997.

Other vetoes Friday included:

A bill that would have made it easier for Child Protective Services to remove children from a home while investigating possible abuse. The governor agreed with critics that the measure would infringe on the rights of parents and guardians. At the same time, Perry ordered the Department of Family and Protective Services to develop statewide procedures for seeking court orders without compromising the rights of parents and families.

A proposal to require that drivers give bikes, motorcyclists and pedestrians at least a 3-foot space when passing,

A resolution that would have requested that Perry appoint a task force on horse and greyhound racing,

A measure that specifies what types of marketing and public opinion campaigns the Texas Department of Transportation can spend money on.

Perry signed legislation allowing public schools to buy electronic textbooks, saying it will "further propel Texas schools into the 21st century and ensure that our students have access to the most up-to-date information available in each subject."

And he said he would allow nine bills to become law without his signature, including a resolution that would have designated the Brady World Championship BBQ Goat Cook-off as the official state goat barbecue championship cook-off.

This report includes material from The Associated Press.

Read more in the Fort Worth Star-Telegram

Wednesday, July 2, 2008

Chesapeake may walk away from Fort Worth site

By JIM FUQUAY - Fort Worth Star Telegram - July 2, 2008
Chesapeake Energy on Tuesday asked the city of Fort Worth to postpone a hearing set for next week on its request for a high-impact drilling permit off Eighth Avenue, near the Berkeley Place and Ryan Place neighborhoods, and indicated that it could back away from the site.

The delay means Chesapeake could lose its lease on the site, which expires Aug. 10, unless it can obtain an extension from the landowner, Fort Worth & Western Railroad. It had intended to use the location, at 2520 Eighth Ave., to drill at least two wells under the railroad’s right-of-way, a nearby church and an apartment complex, according to filings with the Texas Railroad Commission.

The move follows a meeting Monday of Chesapeake officials, neighborhood leaders and railroad representatives. It was the latest in a series of meetings to discuss neighborhood concerns about safety and environmental issues.

Julie Wilson, Chesapeake’s top executive in the Barnett Shale, said Tuesday that the company is prepared to walk away from the lease if it cannot reach a consensus with neighborhood leaders on an acceptable drilling and development plan.

"That doesn’t mean we ever expect to get 100 percent support," Wilson said. "But we did say that, yes, we want the leadership of the neighborhoods to support this."

At the same time, she said, "we don’t want battles in city hall" over the granting of a high-impact drilling permit, which Chesapeake is required to obtain because homes are within the 600-foot buffer required by the city’s drilling ordinance. Chesapeake has been unable to obtain waivers from all property owners within that buffer, making a waiver from the City Council its only option.

The company has not withdrawn its application for a drilling permit at the site.

Council member Joel Burns, who represents the neighborhoods, said that although the issue is not yet resolved, he’s pleased with Chesapeake’s action to postpone what promised to be a contentious hearing.

"They have reached out aggressively in the last month. Unfortunately, a month was not nearly enough time to resolve all these issues," he said.

Neighborhood leaders said they were encouraged by Chesapeake’s approach to the controversy.

"They have a totally new attitude in terms of working with the neighborhoods," said Bill Hall, who attended the meetings as an organizer of the Joint Neighborhood Committee, formed last year to deal with mineral-rights leasing concerns.

Dan Roberts, who attended the meeting as a representative of Ryan Place Improvement Association, said that although he’s not convinced that the company fully appreciates the depth of opposition to drilling at the site, "they’re miles from where they were."

Complicating the issue are comments by railroad representatives who said they will explore other, possibly more intensive, uses at the drill site if it is not used for a gas well. An attorney for the railroad declined to comment on possible plans. But people at the meetings said they include freight storage or rail-car loading.
Read more in the Fort Worth Star Telegram

Sunday, June 22, 2008

Pipeline companies’ right to condemn land may be questioned

By MIKE LEE - The Fort Worth Star Telegram - June 22, 2008
When a gas drilling company wants a piece of land for a pipeline, its representative usually shows up at the owner’s door with a letter from the Texas Railroad Commission, stating that the company has a right to take the land.

Pipeline companies can condemn land because they’re considered either utility companies, which serve the public the same as Atmos or TXU, or "common carriers," a legal term that means they carry oil or gas for anyone.

Major gas companies have formed their own pipeline divisions as they seek routes for gathering pipelines to serve the Barnett Shale. These divisions have the power to condemn land.

However, several local lawyers specializing in pipeline and condemnation matters question whether these divisions should have that power because these pipelines typically serve only one company.

"In order to determine the ultimate answer to that question, somebody’s going to have to get some of these landowners together and challenge this," said Jim Bradbury, a pipeline lawyer who serves on Fort Worth’s gas drilling task force.

Captive utilities

The laws that allow pipeline companies to condemn land were written decades ago, when there was a greater division between the oil business and the pipeline business, said Glenn Sodd, a Corsicana lawyer who specializes in condemnation cases.

Chesapeake Energy’s pipeline division, Texas Midstream Gas Services, was created in 2006 and got its permit from the Railroad Commission in 2007, records show.

XTO Energy acquired its pipeline division, Barnett Gathering, from Antero Resources in 2005 and got a permit from the Railroad Commission in 2006, records show.

The commission issues permits, known as T-4s, that designate a company as a gas utility or common carrier. But commission officials say it isn’t responsible for deciding who gets the power to condemn land.

Spokeswoman Ramona Nye said that the commission has never denied a permit and that the agency gives them out only for administrative purposes.

"A pipeline is a common carrier or gas utility by virtue of their business organization, business activities, and they way they hold themselves out as conducting their business under Texas statutes," she said in an e-mail.

The question is whether "captive utilities" fit the traditional definition of a common carrier, since they carry gas for only one company.

"It’s uncharted territory, as far as I know," said Rick Disney, a Fort Worth lawyer who has handled pipeline cases.

Julie Wilson, vice president of Barnett Shale operations for Chesapeake Energy, said there’s no question that the company’s pipeline division is a gas utility, which gives it the right to condemn land.

"Ownership is irrelevant to a gas utility, so long as you receive the designation of a gas utility company," she said.

Charles Fiscus, a Dallas attorney who also works on condemnation issues, agreed with Wilson. Even if a pipeline serves only one company, it might still be a common carrier, the same way a trucking company might still be a common carrier even though all its trucks are leased to one customer, he said.

"Until there is a determination that a common carrier means you must offer your services to the public and you cannot contract your services to one person, I think there’s an ability to do that," he said.

Wilson said Chesapeake could probably ship other producers’ gas, "provided there’s capacity."

Pipeline power

Pipeline companies have wider condemnation power than a city or an electric company.

When a city wants to condemn land, it is required to have the property appraised.

When an electric company wants to condemn land, it has to file its route with the Public Utility Commission and submit alternate routes, Sodd said.

A pipeline company can condemn land without taking either of those steps, Sodd said.

The Legislature passed a law in 2007 that would have given landowners more rights in all types of condemnation, but Gov. Rick Perry vetoed it. The law would have required companies or governments to make a "bona fide offer" — an offer close to fair market value — for the land before beginning condemnation proceedings.

Matt Miller, executive director of the Institute for Justice-Texas, which advocates for landowner rights, said the Barnett Shale drilling boom might affect enough people to force the Legislature to act again.

"That has to be a legislative fix," he said. "They’re using the fact that we’re facing an energy crisis to push the issue."

City regulation

In the meantime, Fort Worth’s task force is discussing what, if anything, the city can do to regulate pipelines and possibly give homeowners a recourse.

In an April letter to the Mayor and City Council, Assistant City Attorney Sarah Fullenwider wrote that the city can do little about pipelines because they’re already regulated by state and federal agencies.

Southlake and Flower Mound have passed ordinances that require pipeline companies to file detailed maps of their routes.

Southlake requires pipeline companies to get a permit before they begin work. And there are additional requirements for pipelines that aren’t covered by the state and federal government, including "a description of the consideration given to matters of public safety and the avoidance, as far as possible, of existing habitable structures."

Fort Worth’s gas task force is scheduled to discuss the Southlake ordinance when it begins considering pipeline regulations in the next few weeks.

Sodd said the city should use its zoning authority to require pipelines to steer clear of neighborhoods.

"If I tried to build a business in a residential neighborhood, you would see the Planning and Zoning Commission of the city come down on me," he said.

Fullenwider said it’s not clear whether Fort Worth can adopt regulations similar to Southlake’s without getting sued.

"The issue is going to be what happens if the pipeline company refuses to get a permit — cities are going to be in an interesting position," she said.

And the city can’t curtail the pipeline company’s power to condemn land.

Wilson, of Chesapeake, said she thinks Southlake’s ordinance is "in direct violation of state and federal laws and regulations." She said the same would apply if Fort Worth tried to adopt similar regulations.

Even revealing pipeline routes the way Southlake and Flower Mound require would be problematic, Wilson said. The company would lose its flexibility in selecting routes and might be forced to condemn more property, she said. Also, just as it’s common for land speculators to buy property in the path of a proposed highway, the same thing could happen if pipeline companies publicized their routes.

One situation in which the city has some control is when a pipeline company needs to cross a city street. Utilities can’t condemn streets, and city officials have used that advantage to negotiate the routes of a few pipelines.

But, Wilson said, "the city is not allowed to unreasonably withhold approval, either."



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Eminent domain
Eminent domain is the legal term for the process that governments and private companies such as utilities use to acquire land. Pipeline companies and government agencies are required to pay for land they take. Here’s a look at how it works.

Informal negotiation The process differs depending on whether the government or a company is taking a piece of land. Government agencies typically must have the land appraised and show the appraisal to the landowner. When a pipeline company wants a piece of land, a right-of-way agent typically approaches landowners and makes an initial offer, but there’s not always a formal appraisal.

The company is not condemning the land at this point, even though the company typically shows landowners a letter stating that it has the power of eminent domain. A spokeswoman for Chesapeake said the company typically acquires 80 percent of its land at this phase, before any court action.

Condemnation suit If the two sides can’t agree on a value, the company or government that wants the land can file a condemnation suit in a county court at law.

At that point, the judge appoints a group of "special commissioners," who are usually real estate agents or lawyers with real estate experience. The commissioners listen to testimony and determine the value of the land. They can also determine if a landowner should be compensated for other damages, such as the decrease in value to the rest of his or her property.

A landowner is restricted in the evidence he or she can present at this phase. For instance, landowners can’t challenge the government’s or a company’s right to take their land, or complain about quality-of-life issues, said Glenn Sodd, a lawyer who specializes in condemnations.

But they can present appraisals and expert testimony that show how much the land is worth.

Landowners can have their case heard by a jury if they aren’t happy with the value set by the commissioners.

Appeal to District Court Landowners can challenge a county court at law verdict in state District Court.

At this level, a landowner can challenge the government’s or company’s right to take land. An owner can also argue that the seizure is "arbitrary and capricious."

But "that is a very, very tough burden," said Charles Fiscus, a Dallas attorney who handles condemnation cases.

Sources: Star-Telegram research, Texas attorney general’s office


The issue is going to be what happens if the pipeline company refuses to get a permit.

Sarah Fullenwider,
assistant Fort Worth city attorney

Read more in the Fort Worth Star Telegram

Tuesday, February 12, 2008

Water preservation key issue for Railroad Commissioner Candidate Dale Henry

By Sandra Cason - The Marshall News Messenger - Friday, February 08, 2008

It's all about water, said Dale Henry, Democratic candidate for Texas Railroad Commission.

"My campaign is important for one reason," Henry said, "and that is because the state of Texas is running out of water. It is an abused natural resource and the Railroad Commission has done nothing about it for the past 106 years."

If he is elected in this, his third bid for the seat, Henry said he will be the first commissioner with hands-on experience in oil and gas exploration, the industry for which the commission provides oversight.

Henry faces Art Hall and Mark Thompson in the March 4 Democratic Primary. If he is the party nominee, Henry will face Republican incumbent Michael Williams in the November general election.

A resident of Lampasas, 50 miles west of Austin, and a graduate of University of Texas, Henry is a retired employee of Schlumber J company, having worked in the oil fields of Iraq, Iran, Saudi Arabia and the Persian Gulf.

"I spent a number of years in research and development and I hold several fracturing patents," Henry said.

"I've been out there and seen it all," he added.

While many people may not stop to think about it that way, Henry pointed out that oil and gas drilling operations have a tremendous impact on ground water.

"Oil and gas activity inherently produces a lot of water," Henry said. "Water is what is used to bring it to the surface, but on its way, the water accumulates contaminated materials."


A common disposal method for the liquid is "to put it back in the ground."

Henry said he learned of a DeBerry preacher whose church hasn't had water in a number of years. "One well was drilled too close to his church and all the wells in the area are contaminated with salt water. You can drill a hundred good ones, but it takes just one bad well to create a whole bunch of problems," Henry said.

Good drilling practices are particularly important at this point in time because so many production companies are now using a horizontal approach.

"There's an area called the Barnett Shale," Henry said. "It is a very thick layer of stone and breaking through it has never made the effort worthwhile until horizontal drilling. That's the key."

In this method, the pipeline goes down for a distance, "turns a corner," and goes under the stone, Henry explained.

This type of drilling uses "millions of gallons of water per day. Sometimes it will be as much as 275,000 gallons," Henry added.

With such large quantities to be disposed of, Henry said it is more important than ever that the Railroad Commission check all drilling permit applications thoroughly, a practice he claims is not currently followed.

"This rubber-stamping has to stop," he said.

Use of environmentally safe drilling practices are especially important to this area because of Caddo Lake, Henry said.

"I've done hands-on work for the Railroad Commission in Caddo — the plugging of abandoned wells. Ninety percent of those I plugged had not be plugged by Railroad Commission rules and regulations the first time around.

"I will make protecting our water a priority for the Texas Railroad Commission," Henry said in a promotional brochure.

"In dry West Texas, the ranchers have to work hard at salvaging water to grow grass with which to feed cattle and produce beef. At the ranch my wife and I have operated for years, we cut the number of production acres needed per cow and calf from 25 acres to 2.5 acres by getting our water to the right place.

"Water's my passion. I know how to do it," Henry said.

"I'm not a politician and I shouldn't have to be involved in this, but the oil and gas companies are polluting our water, soil, and air, and the Railroad Commission simply turns its back and lets it happen.

"Instead of regulating these industries, the three commissioners are raking in campaign contributions from their executives and political action committees and are burying their heads in the sand.

"It's time for change," Henry said. "I need to bring the knowledge I have back to the people, if they'd like me to share it.

"I can do the job. I want the job.

"The petroleum industry is a great benefit to our state's economy, but that should not come at the expense of our environment or our fresh water supply," he said.

Read more in the Marshall News Messenger

Friday, January 18, 2008

http://www.star-telegram.com/arlington_news/story/418259.html

By JIM FUQUAY - Star-Telegram Staff Writer - Jan. 18, 2008
A sizable yellow flame at Interstate 30 and Beach Street in east Fort Worth is the result of natural gas being burned, or "flared," from a well operated by Fort Worth-based Finley Resources. Chairman Jim Finley said the company has completed two wells at the site since late December and has been flaring the gas as it prepares to connect the wells to a pipeline. He expects the flaring to end soon.

What is flaring, and how it is regulated? Some answers:

When it happens: After a gas well in the Barnett Shale is "fractured" by pumping in water and sand that breaks the rock containing the gas, much of that water flows back out under pressure from the gas. As the gas begins to flow, if the water can't be separated sufficiently, the gas can't be moved to a pipeline. Instead, it can be vented or flared until it has dried sufficiently. The resulting flame can flare 50 feet.


STAR-TELEGRAM/RON T. ENNIS
A natural gas flare from a Finley Resources well off Beach Street in east Fort Worth is seen burning beyond a row of trees Wednesday.

Not all wells are flared: The largest operators in the Barnett Shale, such as Devon Energy, say they can usually avoid flaring by having equipment on site that can handle the large volume of water that initially flows out of a well and still dry the gas enough to ship it to a pipeline.

How it's controlled:
The Texas Railroad Commission, which regulates the Texas petroleum industry, allows the safe release of gas for 10 days after a well is completed, longer with a special exception. It also allows short-term releases under several other circumstances. No permit is needed for routine flaring and venting. Producers also prefer not to vent or flare gas because they lose the revenue it would have brought if sold into a pipeline.

Is it safe? Flaring is considered safer than venting, which is unburned gas released under pressure. Natural gas, which is mostly methane, is the cleanest-burning hydrocarbon, but it still introduces carbon dioxide, a greenhouse gas, into the atmosphere and also contributes to the formation of ozone, a pollutant and health hazard, said Brian Boerner, environmental management director for the city of Fort Worth.

Read more in the Fort Worth Star Telegram

Monday, November 19, 2007

City of Fort Worth losing bucks by outsourcing gas-lease work

By Mitchell Schnurman - Star-Telegram Staff Writer - Sun, Nov. 18, 2007Fort Worth may be sitting atop a fortune in natural gas, but that's no excuse for not minding the money.

For more than two years, the city has been paying through the nose to outsource its dealings in the Barnett Shale. Instead of doing most of the work in-house, it hired JPMorgan Chase to handle gas leases and monitor royalty runs.

Here's the kicker: It's paying a management fee based on a percentage of revenue, rather than an hourly rate -- a costly mistake, given the run-up in local mineral rights.

In the past two years, the city has paid $1.9 million in fees to JPMorgan, with $1 million more likely due in a few months. If the contract remains in place over the long term, the city's tab could reach $30 million.

Meanwhile, other public entities with major gas reserves, such as Dallas/Fort Worth Airport, the Tarrant Regional Water District and the city of Arlington, are paying far smaller amounts to outsiders. Their employees do much of the work, and they hire experts on a project basis.

Like the state of Texas, which does a huge business in mineral rights, they've decided not to give away part of a revenue stream that could run for 30 years.

Fort Worth has brought in $31 million in natural gas revenue. Compare its revenue and spending with Arlington's: It signed gas leases worth $42 million and spent $386,000 in outside fees.

Fort Worth and JPMorgan both defend the high-dollar arrangement.

"You get what you pay for," says Paul Midkiff, managing director at JPMorgan and the point man for gas work for the city. "Arlington may end up with more problems than they understand. There's more to it than just getting a lease signed."

JPMorgan gets 5 percent of the signing bonus for the leases it arranges and 4 percent of the annual royalties from the gas itself. Fort Worth officials say they're pleased with the arrangement.

"The city could not have generated the same amount of revenue without JPMorgan Chase expertise, knowledge and the respect they command in the gas leasing industry," Engineering Director Doug Rademaker said in a statement.

The city's endorsement has helped the bank land other public clients. Tarrant County and the Fort Worth school district have agreed to the same commissions on bonuses and royalties. And Midkiff says that Euless, North Richland Hills and several nonprofit groups signed deals for bonuses alone.

Midkiff says he provides many services for a city. He coordinates the bid process, evaluates offers for their effects on the community and, perhaps most importantly, cuts through the "analysis paralysis" that often grips government.

"Fort Worth has been signing lease deals for two years now, because they hired me," he says. "Tarrant County didn't make a single deal, but I've already done five this year. The benefit of hiring me is, you get somebody to push through the bureaucracy and do it right."

By all reports, Midkiff is a competent guy, who has done a fine job in getting top dollar for Fort Worth. My beef is with JPMorgan's fees. Couldn't Fort Worth get expert help on gas leasing -- maybe even Midkiff's help -- for a fraction of the cost?

Midkiff says the work is too hard for him to accept an hourly rate: "I wouldn't do it," he says.

But he did agree to serve as a consultant to D/FW Airport for a one-time fee. And JPMorgan monitors D/FW's royalties for a flat $100,000 a year.

"It wouldn't be fair to expect 4 percent on the amount of gas that D/FW is generating," Midkiff says.

OK, but Fort Worth isn't exactly chopped liver. The city says its natural gas revenue will total $742 million over the next 20 years.

Midkiff says that managing Fort Worth's project is more complicated that D/FW's. The city has dozens of leases, several drillers and a wide range of properties, from small street corners to big acreage under water-treatment plants. That's more labor intensive.

Maybe, but is the work 10 times tougher -- or 20 times?

Fort Worth can drop the JPMorgan contract with 45 days' notice, and it's disheartening that the staff hasn't proposed that already.

Hiring JPMorgan may have made sense in March 2004, when the deal was struck. Payouts hadn't soared yet, and city leaders and staffers were worried about their lack of industry knowledge.

They still say they don't want to get into the oil and gas business, but that line sounds timid and tired today. We're not talking about wildcatting here. Being a royalty owner is not that daunting.

Neighborhood groups in Tarrant County are regularly winning great lease deals by simply using volunteers and a legal review. Perhaps Fort Worth should hire a gas administrator, a position that D/FW is advertising for right now.

But somebody at City Hall has to get a lot more thorough on the subject. In September 2003, the staff recommended hiring a private management firm for gas leasing, and Rademaker showed the City Council a chart comparing the costs of an outside firm versus using city staff.

The outsiders would cost 28 percent less, he said.

The decision looked like a no-brainer, and the presentation was finished in 10 minutes, with almost no discussion.

Unfortunately, the chart projected costs for only two years, which is akin to choosing an adjustable-rate mortgage based just on the teaser payments. The really big bucks -- on ARMs and this deal -- are on the back end.

The staff also underestimated the revenue by a huge amount. It assumed a signing bonus of $500 an acre, the prevailing rate at the time; the city's latest deal topped $17,000 an acre. Prices of natural gas have surged since then, too, and the wells have been more productive than expected.

Higher bonuses and more gas revenue translate into much higher fees and change the equation entirely.

Maybe the staff and elected leaders couldn't know all this then. But they can't miss it now.

Gene Powell, who's been in the oil and gas business for 42 years, has criticized the city's gas-management deal from the start. He writes the Powell Barnett Shale Newsletter and says his readers include about 50 financial analysts.

"They're always asking me, 'What's the best deal you've ever seen in the Barnett Shale?'" Powell says. "That's easy: JPMorgan's contract with the city of Fort Worth."

Sunday, August 12, 2007

Boom or Fizzle

By JEFF MOSIER - The Dallas Morning News - Sunday, August 12, 2007

Barnett Shale natural gas has made boomtowns out of many places in North Texas. But for some, a bust might be on the way.

The exponential growth of drilling in the massive gas field has made millions for local governments. However, the dramatic increase in tax rolls has eased in some early exploration hot spots and reversed in others, thanks to lower natural gas prices last year and migration of new drilling southward.

Denton County's mineral values dropped by about $1 billion this year, and Wise County lost $190 million in value. Both were on the leading edge of the Barnett Shale boom.

The mineral values in Tarrant County grew slightly, but the two school districts with the highest mineral values saw their numbers slide.

"It's great to have this value," said John Marshall, Tarrant County's chief appraiser. "But I've warned them [local governments] that counting on this being steady every year is not a good idea."

Tarrant County's mineral values are up 18 percent in 2007, which is a trickle after nearly doubling in each of the two previous years. Mr. Marshall said Tarrant County's mineral values will eventually peak and possibly drop steeply like in Denton County – although no one can predict how quickly.

The early signs of a decline are already here.

The mineral values of the Eagle Mountain-Saginaw school district in northwest Tarrant County – where the county's early drilling started – dropped by nearly 9 percent. And Northwest Independent School District in Denton County, which has more than $2 billion in mineral values, saw an even sharper decline.

An 11 percent drop in the average natural gas price in 2006 contributed to the slump, but it's also the result of more drilling moving toward southern Tarrant County and Johnson and Parker counties.

Some companies have even started exploring in Dallas County. Since December, permits for 22 wells in Dallas County have been approved by the Texas Railroad Commission. Wells have been cleared in Dallas, Grand Prairie and Irving as well as areas in Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport and just north of Waxahachie.

Budget concerns

A slowdown won't make a critical difference at budget time for many cities and school districts – most of which count mineral values as less than 2 percent of their total tax base.

For others, this could be a bigger problem.

Krum ISD Superintendent Troy Hamm said his Denton County district was classified as poor just six years ago.

Since then, the property values skyrocketed from $182 million to $723 million – a majority of that from gas. Mineral values now make up nearly half the district's tax rolls.

Recently, Mr. Hamm received a letter from the Texas Education Agency naming Krum a property-wealthy district that must share revenue with poorer districts.

"How long we can maintain it, I don't know," Mr. Hamm said.

Mr. Hamm said the new gas well money has helped boost teacher pay to a competitive level and eased the cost of a bond package that included an early childhood center and fine arts auditorium at the high school.

At the same time, his district's mineral wealth – down 8 percent this year – might have peaked. The drop was offset by new strip malls and subdivisions filled with starter homes, but that gave the district a slim 4 percent growth in its tax base.

Mr. Hamm said the 1,400-student district hasn't spent its entire windfall. Krum ISD expects to have about $6 million in reserves, which is enough to operate for about six months and perhaps cushion its finances against the volatile mineral values.

"We've been cognizant of the fact that this well will run dry soon, if you'll pardon the pun," Mr. Hamm said.


Natural cycle

The mineral values in booming areas tend to have a sharp incline and then a sharp decline just because of the nature of the calculation.

The mineral values are calculated only when a well starts producing, but then reserves are depleted every day. If prices remain steady, the values rise only if the number of new wells drilled outpaces the declining value of the existing ones.

Gas wells in the Barnett Shale tend to be very productive during the first year of operation, so the decline in mineral values for an active well is particularly steep. Vic Henderson, engineering services manager at Pritchard & Abbott Inc., which estimates the mineral values for local appraisal districts, said it's common for production to drop by 50 percent or 60 percent by the end of the first year.

The wells are projected to keep producing for at least 12 to 15 years, although Mr. Henderson believes they could pump natural gas out of the Barnett Shale for even longer.

Julie Wilson, a spokeswoman for the Chesapeake Energy Corp., said her company has plans for new wells at least through 2013, although that could change with technological advances or more restrictive city ordinances.

Gas wealth hasn't made a difference for every school district with wells. Janice Cooper, superintendent of the Lake Worth school district, said she hasn't seen much of an upside.

"We do nothing but go backwards," she said. "As our appraised values go up, the state sends us less money."

Dr. Cooper said the boost from drilling in the Barnett Shale has been offset in her district by the educational funding formula set in Austin. Mineral values make up more than 38 percent of the district's tax rolls.

Now, mineral wealth in the Lake Worth district is starting to drop slightly – 15 percent this year. Dr. Cooper said she hopes that as the values decrease, that will lead to an increase in state funding and keep the district's finances steady.

"I hate to say that things could get worse because I know they can, but I don't anticipate that will be the case," she said.

A different view

Not everyone is expecting a quick increase and quick decline when it comes to mineral values.

Mickey Hand, chief appraiser for Wise County, said his decline in mineral values mostly comes from the drop in natural gas prices. He also said that drillers have shifted their focus to more suburban areas. Drilling is generally prohibited within 300 feet of homes – although that can increase to 1,000 feet depending on the city ordinance – so many energy companies are trying to get wells in place ahead of subdivisions.

"They are not in as quite a hurry here," Mr. Hand said about his still mostly rural county.

But he said he expected the gas companies to return soon and focus more on Wise County when the suburban and urban areas are tapped out.

In the Denton County town of DISH, mineral values make up two-thirds of the tax base.

Mayor Calvin Tillman said the 25 percent drop in mineral values this year will cut deeply into his finances. The town will lose about $10,000 from an $80,000 budget.

Luckily, Mr. Tillman said, the town has $20,000 in reserves to possibly hold it over until an 80-home subdivision starts selling. The town also intends to annex more land.

"I think we're going to be OK," he said. "We've made it a priority to replace the gas money."
Read more

Saturday, June 30, 2007

Operators, excavators face revamped pipeline rules

Railroad Commission granted power to levy fines up to $10,000 per day
Galen Scott - Weatherford Democrat - June 27, 2007

The Texas Railroad Commission (RRC) recently announced new rules to help protect the state’s 200,000 miles of intrastate pipelines — more intrastate pipelines than any other state in the nation.

Historically, domestic oil and gas exploration has taken place in rural, underdeveloped parts of the country, but the Barnett Shale is buried beneath some of the most densely populated areas in North Texas. When they run through urban development, pipelines can become especially vulnerable.

According to the RRC, damage by third-parties — homeowners, contractors, city or state employees or anyone digging near pipelines — is the leading cause of pipeline accidents.

In March, an excavator laying pipeline for Crosstex Energy Services struck a pipeline near the East Parker County community of Dicey. Though no serious injuries were reported, the accident ignited a towering stack of flames and the concerns of local residents already worried about the growing number of petrocarbon pipelines crisscrossing Parker County.

Pipeline accidents are happening more and more often in Texas. Railroad Commission Chairperson Elizabeth Ames Jones reported receiving 149 notifications of third-party pipeline damage in 2004. That number increased to 275 the next year and in 2006 it jumped even higher to 301 reports, or an average of six incidents each week.

Jones said the RRC’s new rules are designed to stop the trend toward increasing numbers of damage reports.

The RRC held three public meetings in 2006 to gather input on proposed rules from pipeline operators and contractors and other groups that dig near lines. Based on these meetings, the rules came to incorporate 10 “best practices” from a national pipeline protection safety organization called the Common Ground Alliance.

And for the first time, the RRC has the authority to issue fines for rule violations. Monetary penalties made possible by the new laws allow for up to $10,000 per day for each violation. The RRC also can also impose non-monetary penalties, such as issuing a warning or requiring mandatory attendance at safety training.

Railroad Commissioner Michael Williams expects the new rules to bring about a significant reduction in the number of pipeline incidents and said the RRC will continue monitoring data in order to gauge impact.

Fellow Commissioner Victor Carrillo emphasized the importance of having enforcement teeth built in to the state’s damage prevention efforts and said the action, “will help achieve a key agency goal in enhancing public safety regarding underground pipelines in Texas.”

See Weatherford-Democrat

Regional focus on air quality - State environmental agency offers grants to clean up gas compressors

Galen Scott - Weatherford Democrat - June 22, 2007
State environmental officials announced $4 million in grants designed to help Texas natural gas producers limit harmful emission levels Friday.

Nine counties in the Dallas/Fort Worth air quality non-attainment area, including Parker, were identified in a group where “rich-burn” gas compressor engines are producing high levels of nitrogen oxide (NOx).
“Rich-burn” engines run on natural gas and are usually located near individual gas wells or at extraction junctions. Though most produce less than 500 horsepower, official estimates indicate the engines emit 32 tons of NOx per day and contribute to the growing Metroplex air quality problem.

The engines are used for moving natural gas to market. Since mineral production levels in the Fort Worth Basin began their steady climb six years ago, an unknown number of compressors have been installed.

Andrea Morrow, a spokesperson for the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality said the agency is currently conducting a study to find out how many of the rich-burn compressor engines are in each county.

“[The engines] are going to need to be retrofitted in order to comply with the new rules and these grants are going to help with the cost of that,” Morrow said.

Despite prolific activity associated with the Barnett Shale, the incentive to cooperate could be higher in East Texas where the state also offered 33 other counties the same retrofit reimbursement deal.

Sen. Kevin Eltife (R-Tyler) authored Senate Bill 2000, which freed up the funding. Eltife’s district managed to ward off non-attainment classification in 1997 when the federal Environmental Protection Agency announced additional eight-hour ozone standards. If East Texas counties remain in attainment, the region could avoid the same set of motor vehicle restrictions currently hinging on the next Metroplex air quality assessment.

“This legislation set up a grant program to help reduce emissions in our area on certain compressors in the oil field by over 96 percent,” Eltife said in a statement. “This is very important in helping us keep our area in attainment.”

In 1990, the EPA classified nine counties surrounding Dallas and Fort Worth as “moderate” ozone non-attainment, meaning those counties failed to meet national air quality standards. Since the original federal designation, Metroplex non-attainment areas have failed to achieve compliance by deadlines mandated in 1996 and 1999, and the EPA reclassified the region as “serious.” After an extension was granted in 1999, the pending DFW attainment date was set for November of this year.

Several important federal concessions are tied to an area’s EPA air quality attainment status, including transportation funding, but whether or not gas operators in the Dallas/Fort Worth area will choose to participate in the grant program remains to be seen.

The grant system was designed to serve as a partial reimbursement of costs associated with the installation of new NOx reduction systems. So far, retrofitting remains voluntary, emissions reductions must be verified in order to receive grant money and the state only provides a 75 percent reimbursement of capital costs.

And because much of local gas exploration is taking place near businesses and homes, some Barnett Shale drillers are already paying out of pocket to address noise and safety concerns.

Three local operators did not immediately respond to requests for interviews regarding the compressor engine grant program Friday.
See Weatherford-Democrat

gscott@weatherforddemocrat.com

State environmental officials announced $4 million in grants designed to help Texas natural gas producers limit harmful emission levels Friday.

Nine counties in the Dallas/Fort Worth air quality non-attainment area, including Parker, were identified in a group where “rich-burn” gas compressor engines are producing high levels of nitrogen oxide (NOx).

“Rich-burn” engines run on natural gas and are usually located near individual gas wells or at extraction junctions. Though most produce less than 500 horsepower, official estimates indicate the engines emit 32 tons of NOx per day and contribute to the growing Metroplex air quality problem.

The engines are used for moving natural gas to market. Since mineral production levels in the Fort Worth Basin began their steady climb six years ago, an unknown number of compressors have been installed.

Andrea Morrow, a spokesperson for the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality said the agency is currently conducting a study to find out how many of the rich-burn compressor engines are in each county.

“[The engines] are going to need to be retrofitted in order to comply with the new rules and these grants are going to help with the cost of that,” Morrow said.

Despite prolific activity associated with the Barnett Shale, the incentive to cooperate could be higher in East Texas where the state also offered 33 other counties the same retrofit reimbursement deal.

Sen. Kevin Eltife (R-Tyler) authored Senate Bill 2000, which freed up the funding. Eltife’s district managed to ward off non-attainment classification in 1997 when the federal Environmental Protection Agency announced additional eight-hour ozone standards. If East Texas counties remain in attainment, the region could avoid the same set of motor vehicle restrictions currently hinging on the next Metroplex air quality assessment.

“This legislation set up a grant program to help reduce emissions in our area on certain compressors in the oil field by over 96 percent,” Eltife said in a statement. “This is very important in helping us keep our area in attainment.”

In 1990, the EPA classified nine counties surrounding Dallas and Fort Worth as “moderate” ozone non-attainment, meaning those counties failed to meet national air quality standards. Since the original federal designation, Metroplex non-attainment areas have failed to achieve compliance by deadlines mandated in 1996 and 1999, and the EPA reclassified the region as “serious.” After an extension was granted in 1999, the pending DFW attainment date was set for November of this year.

Several important federal concessions are tied to an area’s EPA air quality attainment status, including transportation funding, but whether or not gas operators in the Dallas/Fort Worth area will choose to participate in the grant program remains to be seen.

The grant system was designed to serve as a partial reimbursement of costs associated with the installation of new NOx reduction systems. So far, retrofitting remains voluntary, emissions reductions must be verified in order to receive grant money and the state only provides a 75 percent reimbursement of capital costs.

And because much of local gas exploration is taking place near businesses and homes, some Barnett Shale drillers are already paying out of pocket to address noise and safety concerns.

Three local operators did not immediately respond to requests for interviews regarding the compressor engine grant program Friday.

Sunday, June 3, 2007

Injection Well Failure in Wise County

by TxSharon
This is a must read report by Sharon Wilson and Tracy Smith. It was posted March 17, 2007 but is still pertinent, especially with increased injection well development in Arlington, Fort Worth and Parker County.

Read well researched article with photos by Tracy Smith.

Wednesday, May 23, 2007

Barnett Shale gas field paying off

55,000 jobs, homeowner royalties part of $5B impact
By LAURIE FOX / The Dallas Morning News - Thursday, May 17, 2007
lfox@dallasnews.com


The financial reach of the Barnett Shale touches all facets of life, generating a $5 billion local economic impact and more than 55,000 jobs.

Pipeline workers find jobs digging miles of trenches. Homeowners collect royalty checks from leases. And cities build roads and sidewalks with money earned from drilling under parks.
Read more

Travel to other worlds ... UTA Planetarium

Immersive full-dome 3-D Digital planetarium show narrated by Ewan McGregor (Obi wan Kepobi from Star Wars) - Astronaut takes you exporing the worlds of inner and outer space. The movie is projected all around you. You recline in specially constructed chairs which enables you to comfortably view the immersive full-dome planetarium show. Astronaut! (produced from the National Space Centre in England) goes beyond the stereotypical space movie. Experience a rocket launch from inside the body of the astronaut. Float around the international Space Station moving thorugh the microscopic regions of the human body! Discover the beauty and perils as "Chad", the test astronaut experiences everything thrown at him.




Summer Schedule (June 2-August 26):

Astronaut!


shows at the UTA Planetarium.


Wed. through Saturdays at 11 a.m.
and Thursday at 7:00 p.m.




Cosmic CSI

shows at the UTA Planetarium 3-D Digital Dome.


Wed. through Saturdays at 2 p.m.




Rock Hall of Fame 1 (The Original)


shows at the UTA Planetarium.


Thursday at 8:00 p.m.




Read more (Warning their flat dull website doesn't give much of a glimmer of the multi-dimensional experience you'll have once you enter the dome of the UTA Planetarium!)


Admission: Adults: $5.00


Seniors, Students, Children: $4.00


UTA Faculty, Staff & Alumni (with ID): $3.00


UTA Studens (with ID): $2.00


Groups of 10 or more with reservation: $3.00


Call 817 272-1183 or e-mail planetarium@uta.edu