About Air and Water

Thursday, March 5, 2015

Chemical Plant in Waxahachie has exploded before

By Faith Chatham - DFW Regional Concerned Citizens - Jan. 27, 2015  - Updated March 5, 2015:
This is not the first time that the neighborhood where Navarro College and West Elementary School in Waxahachie has been covered with the black smoke from an inferno caused by an explosion at the Magablend Chemical Plant in Waxahachie, Texas. Here are some images from an explosion at that facility Oct. 3, 2011. A fire broke out at the Magnablend Chemical Plant near State Highway 287 and Interstate 35E at 10:35 a.m. Oct. 3, 2011. The plant exploded and school children were evacuated from a near-by school.

In 2011n Lisa Wheeler of the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality stated that the plant deals with " ammonia, sulfuric, hydrochloric, nitric and phosphoric acids and mixes them for fertilizer and agricultural products." The Magnablend Plant in Waxahachie is about a 45 minute drive 51 miles north of the town of West which was devastated by a fertilizer plant explosion in 2013 which killed 15 people and injured 225.

 Here are some images from the October 3rd 2011 explosion:
In October 2011 the air blew the smoke and contaminants from the explosion in Ellis County into Dallas County. News reports of that 2011 explosion:

In 2011 NCB5 reported the inadequacies of local fire and rescue in combatting the blaze.


Waxahachie Fire Chief David Hudgins said crews that arrived shortly after the first alarm saw thick smoke and flames coming from the facility. Hudgins said they quickly realized the fire was too intense to battle from the inside, so they tried to drench the flames using unmanned water cannons placed inside the building.

When the water cannons didn't work, firefighters tried to tap into the sprinkler system to force more water through the pipes and out of the sprinkler heads. Hudgins said the sprinkler system was either damaged in the initial explosion or didn't have enough pressure.

"As you know a sprinkler system is designed for x-number of heads to go off," he said. "If more heads than that go off, you don't have adequate water coming out. That's where the fire department comes in. That's the first thing we did was go to the sprinkler system to pump into it, and it was not helping any."
 Some footage of the 2011 explosion are available from WFAA's coverage  and NBC5's coverage.

In 2011 there were no injuries. Huffington  Post reported:
Magnablend spokesman Donald Golden told WFAA-TV that 25 to 30 employees who were inside the plant's 100,000-square-foot warehouse evacuated safely when the fire broke out before 11 a.m. Golden said the company manufactures about 200 products, including some that are hazardous when ignited.
A firetruck was consumed by the blaze while firefighters were combatting the blaze.

In 2011  WFAA Channel 8 reported:

According to fire department records, the plant's sprinkler system has never been analyzed.
The plant was inspected twice by the Waxahachie fire marshal once when Magnablend moved in and again during a a 30-minute walk-through in February of this year.
Apart from some blocked exits, the fire marshal said the plant appeared to be in good condition and its housekeeping looked good.
Records also show that Magnablend's sister plant on the north end of town and a plant with even more dangerous chemicals than the one that that erupted in flames has not been officially inspected by the Waxahachie Fire Department since June 2007.
Chief Hudgins confirmed what the records indicate: That plant has no sprinkler system at all. Hudgins said it wasn't required when the plant was grandfathered after the area was annexed by the city in 1985.
Moving forward, Chief Hudgins said he will propose a new ordinance requiring a thorough inspection by a qualified fire protection engineer of every building in Waxahachie whose owner is applying for a certificate of occupancy.
He also said his department has learned from this experience and vows to review every facility that poses a public safety risk.

Chief Hudgins also told WFAA: "Sometimes when people move out of a building and somebody else moves in, there could be a mistake; you could need a bigger system, but we are not the experts to tell you that, Hudgins said."

The recent incident on Monday, January 26, 2015 is described by company representatives as a "Chemical Spill."  Witnesses reported hearing a "boom" that sounded like an explosion. The company said from inside a plastic

The Waxahachie  published a timeline on some of the repercussions from the Jan. 27th 2015 chemical spill in Waxahachie.

UPDATE 4:10 p.m.: Officials are going to shut down the I-35E northbound frontage road from Farm-to-Market 387 north to near Red Oak. Avoid the area.
UPDATE 4:36 p.m.: Texas Commission on Environmental Quality representatives are onsite, starting their investigation into the sodium chloride spill, TCEQ spokesperson Andrea Morrew said."
 UPDATE 4:36 p.m.: Texas Commission on Environmental Quality representatives are onsite, starting their investigation into the sodium chloride spill, TCEQ spokesperson Andrea Morrew said.
"Northbound frontage roads are closed. Sterrett Road on-ramp to northbound I-35E is closed," said Ryan LaFontaine, a TxDot spokeswoman said. "The frontage road and the on-ramp will remain closed until they're cleared by first responders."
At this time, those roads are closed indefinitely, he said.

UPDATE 4:10 p.m.: Officials are going to shut down the I-35E northbound frontage road from Farm-to-Market 387 north to near Red Oak. Avoid the area.
UPDATE 3:38 p.m.: Additional Ellis County Sheriff's Office deputies are headed to the east side of U.S. Highway 77 to notify residents about the spill.

"New information has come up that there are more of these same totes in there that were delivered from the same company," said Randall Potter, Waxahachie assistant fire chief. "We don’t know if those were contaminated. They are not sure what caused the malfunction. It is mostly likely that something was accidently mixed in with the chemical, like the tanks they put the stuff in were not washed thoroughly or something. Something caused it to off gas. There were 12 of these things delivered at the same time. So we are not sure if the rest of them are going to do it until the Hazmat company comes and makes sure we are all good we are going to expand the zone."  (Corsicana Daily Sun)

Some of the same problems which contributed to the devastation of West, Texas impact other small counties in Texas. A year after the explosion in West, the Industrial  Chairman Rafael Moure-Eraso of the National Chemical Safety Board stated when the Board issued it's report a year after the explosion at West, that the fertilizer plant explosion at West "should never have occurred," and was "preventable".

CNN reported that U.S. Chemical Safety Board Agency report blamed the company that owned the fertilizer plant, government regulators and other authorities for the incident.
"It resulted from the failure of a company to take the necessary steps to avert a preventable fire and explosion and from the inability of federal, state and local regulatory agencies to identify a serious hazard and correct it," Moure-Eraso said.
McLennan County, for example, didn't have an emergency response plan in place, and "the community clearly was not aware of the potential hazard at West Fertilizer," the report said.
A lack of fire codes was repeatedly cited in the report, with investigators noting Texas didn't have a fire code and small counties are prohibited from having them. But, the chairman said, local fire departments need fire codes to "hold industrial operators accountable for safe storage and handling of chemicals." The Report cited McLennan County for "not having an emergency response plan in place when and the community was not aware of the potential hazards at West Fertilizer."

A problem that impacts small counties in Texas is that Texas doesn't have a fire code and small counties under 250,000 population which are not adjacent to counties of 250,000 population are prohibited by Texas State Law from enacting a County Fire Code. A lack of fire codes was repeatedly cited in the West accident report, with investigators noting Texas didn't have a fire code and small counties are prohibited from having them. The chairman said," local fire departments need fire codes" to "hold industrial operators accountable for safe storage and handling of chemicals."

Fact Checking the statement: I placed a call to Austin and was connected with the The Texas Fire Board under the Texas Insurance Commission. They affirmed that Texas does not have a state fire code. Counties of under 250,000 which are not adjacent to counties of at least 250,000 are prohibited by Texas state law from enacting a fire code.

Ellis County was able to Enact A Fire Code:

Following the Oct. 3, 2011 explosion at the March  Chemical Plant in Waxahachie, Ellis County enacted a Fire Code   Effective Jan. 1, 2013, Ellis County requires commercial buildings to meet the requirements of the newly enacted Fire Code.  Adjacent to two counties in excess of 250,000 population Ellis County was able to adopt a Fire Code. Navarro County,which is under 250,000 population and not adjacent to a county of that size, if prohibited by Texas State Law from enacting a Fire Code.  Expansion of the Industrial Park in Navarro County could place residents at greater risk because of overreaching state laws which prohibit local authorities from taking prudent action and enacting and enforcing a reasonable Fire Code. 

Local officials learned from the events in West and at the Magnablend Plant. In 2012 they began the process to adopt a Fire Code and to update their Preparedness Plan. By January 1, 2013 they had removed all the exemptions for plants which were grandfathered and made all of them comply with the new County Fire Code. Even though Ellis has less than 250,000 population, they were able to enact the Fire Code because they are adjacent to both Dallas and Tarrant counties and each of those counties exceed 250,000 in population. Having the authority to inspect and enforce the new Fire Code helped local responders address accidents at the Magnablend Plant in 2015. Knowledge of what chemicals they were facing and the floorplan of the facility enabled responders to contain the incident faster with less property loss and greater safety to the responders and employees and citizens in the vicinity.

Nearby counties such as McLennan (where West is located) and Navarro (which has a fertilizer plant) are not as fortunate as Ellis. For some reason State Legislators decided that most of the counties in Texas should not have the same opportunity as Ellis to assess the dangers that exist in their communities and to enact Fire Codes should they decide there is sufficient need., From Austin, those who run for office citing too much government and denouncing governmental "overreaching" chose to upsup local authority and micromanage from afar, despite evidence that enforcement of Fire Regulations prevents or minimizes loss of property and harm to human beings.

During the 2015 Legislative Session in Austin three identical bills have been filed, all seeking to remove the prohibition from the Local Government Code. They are:
HB924: http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/BillLookup/History.aspx?LegSess=84R&Bill=HB924


SB327: http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/BillLookup/History.aspx?LegSess=84R&Bill=SB00327
Rep. Ryan Guillen (D) (956 716-4838) and Representative Kenneth Sheets ( R) (214 370-8305) and Senator Juan “Chuy” Hinojosa (956-972-1842) have filed (respectively) HB924, HB684 and SB327. Hopefully at least one of them will get out of committee and be enacted into law.  

Dallas Observer Coverage of Fracking and Gas Drilling Ordinance in Mansfield

http://blogs.dallasobserver.com/unfairpark/2015/03/mansfield_fracking_regulations.php

Thursday, July 10, 2014

Report on Capacity Model

http://s3.amazonaws.com/static.texastribune.org/media/documents/2014-01-31_-_Brattle_Report_on_Economically_Optimal_Reserve_Margin_in_ERCOT.pdf

Energy Market Overhaul


 

The Brief: Rift Opens Between Oil, Electric Interests on Market Overhaul

 
          by John Reynolds,   The Texas Tribune    i
       
http://www.texastribune.org/2014/01/09/brief/

The Big Conversation

The Public Utility Commission's proposed changes to the electric market gained a powerful detractor in recent days: the Texas Oil and Gas Association, the state's oldest and largest petroleum organization.
As reported by the Tribune's Jim Malewitz, TXOGA sent a letter to the PUC last week saying it opposed creating a capacity market "that would pay electricity providers billions of dollars to maintain excess generating capacity." The move also opens a rift between the influential petroleum group and the electric utility industry, which backs the capacity market model.
TXOGA asserted in its letter that the PUC did not have the authority to embark on a market redesign and that a capacity market would not work as intended. Instead, more efforts should be made to take advantage of "smart grid" technology, TXOGA argued.

Thursday, June 19, 2014

Texas Among Nation's Worst Water Polluters

Texas Among Nation's Worst Water Polluters

Texas is the second-biggest water polluter in the country, in terms of pounds released, according a new report. But when the toxicity of the pollution is factored in, Texas jumps to the top of the list — and it’s not even close.

Texas polluters released about 16.5 million pounds of toxic chemicals into waterways in 2012, second only to Indiana, according to a report released Thursday by Environment Texas, an environmental advocacy group based in Austin. 

And in terms of a measurement that compares pollutants according to how toxic they are, Texas is without rival. According to the report, Texas produced 34 million “toxicity-weighted pounds” in 2012 — 30 times more than the next state, and more than double the rest of the country combined. Almost all of that toxicity comes from one source: the Dow Chemical Company plant in Freeport.

“You can slice your Texas toast either way and it comes up toxic,” said John Rumpler, one of the authors. “We can do it [by weighted toxicity], and Texas comes up among the worst. Or we can just do it by straight-up volume, purely pounds of toxic chemicals dumped into rivers, and Texas still comes up one of the worst.”

The report is based on data self-reported by polluters to the Environmental Protection Agency. The EPA only requires this information from certain industrial facilities, which leaves out other sources of toxic pollution, including oil and gas drilling, the report notes. 

The Dow plant wasn't among the top 50 facilities in 2012 in terms of total pollution. But its chemical runoff, which flows into the Brazos river and the Gulf of Mexico, included 3 pounds of dioxin, an extremely toxic chemical that can cause reproductive and developmental problems, immune system damage, and cancer. According to the EPA's guidelines, that's equivalent to 33.4 million toxicity-weighted pounds. 

A Dow spokeswoman acknowledged that the facility had released 3 pounds of dioxin, but disputed the EPA's toxicity measurement.

"Our water emissions are closely monitored and reported and we are in compliance with all state and federal permits," the spokeswoman, Trish Thompson, said in an email.

According to the EPA's website, the Freeport plant was noncompliant for 12 consecutive quarters ending in 2013, the most recent year for which data are available.

The top overall water polluter in Texas was the Pilgrim’s Pride chicken-processing plant in Mount Pleasant, which in 2012 dumped 2.8 million pounds of toxic chemicals into the Tankersley River in Northeast Texas, the report says. Most of those toxins were nitrates, chemicals found in fertilizer that can cause infant health problems and oxygen-depleted “dead zones” in waterways.   

A spokesman from Pilgrim's Pride said he couldn't comment without having read the report.

Luke Metzger, director of Environment Texas, said the case of Pilgrim’s Pride shows that Texas water pollution is a statewide issue not limited to the chemical plants on the coast. 

“There are still millions of pounds of very dangerous chemicals going into our waterways which could put human health and the environment at risk," he said.

The report recommends that the federal government approve rules proposed earlier this year by the EPA and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers that would extend Clean Water Act coverage to more small waterways. It also calls for stricter enforcement of existing regulations. According to Rumpler, lax state enforcement is a major reason for Texas’ poor water pollution record.

The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, which is responsible for enforcing environmental regulations in the state, "has not done its job in terms of either enforcing limits on pollution, or attaching stringent enough pollution limits in the first place to ensure that Texas rivers are clean," Rumpler said.

A spokesman from TCEQ declined to comment, saying he had not yet read the report.

This article originally appeared in The Texas Tribune at http://www.texastribune.org/2014/06/19/texas-among-nations-worst-water-polluters/.

Thursday, June 12, 2014

'Turn Red Seats Blue and END the Obstruction in Congress'

'Turn Red Seats Blue and END the Obstruction in Congress'

I'm supporting David E. Cozad for Congress. To stop the obstruction and have enough votes for Texas's priorities to be funded, we must send 7 more Democrats from Texas to the U.S. Congress.



To pass Pay Day Fairness we must change the ratio of Red to Blue.

Every Republican (women and men) voted against fairness for women in the workplace.



David E. Cozad will fight for Pay Day Fairness.

Tuesday, June 10, 2014

Tuesday, April 1, 2014

Fracking fluid may be headed from Johnson County run-off into Joe Pool Lake

http://www.wfaa.com/home/Runoff-from-injection-well-site-worries-land-owners-138163754.html by CASEY NORTON WFAA Posted on January 27, 2012 at 11:58 PM Updated Friday, Jan 27 at 11:58 PM JOHNSON COUNTY - Rain raised lake levels and eyebrows in Johnson County. Water broke through a containment wall at a saltwater injection well and into a creek. Land owners want to know why authorities aren't doing more to stop it. Home video shows white water pouring through the berm during Wednesday's rainstorm. What was supposed to be contained inside the saltwater injection well site ran through an unnamed creek. The property owner says it's not the first time the berm has broken. "It does look different. It does smell different," Jennifer Dunlap said. "And we have had instances when the water in the creek has a sheen on top of the water." Dunlap is worried the cloudy, white water could be mixed with fracking fluids. Every day, dozens of trucks unleash fracking wastewater into a trough system. It splashes out the back of the tankers. That waste is collected in the trough and pumped into tanks, a reservoir or underground, but Dunlap is not sure how much from the haulers sprays onto the ground, sitting there until a heavy rain pushes it all into her pastures. "We've had some cattle that have been sick," Dunlap said. "Of course all the trees along the creek have died." She pointed to home video that showed dead trees near the creek bed. Video taken Dec. 5 shows a fog running through the creek. After a year of wondering about the site, that event was enough for Tim McCloskey to start documenting overflows with his camera. "This is our creek here, and in the summer time, there is a lot of white haze along the sides of it after the water recedes," McCloskey said, pointing to the stream that runs the length of the property. The EPA says it has investigated two complaints. On Oct. 13 and Dec. 5, 2011, it found no violations of the Clean Water Act. A spokesperson said rainwater that over tops the berm is not illegal. Containment is enforced by the Texas Railroad Commission. It says all sites are required to have secondary system, in case storage tanks leak. Laws say rainwater runoff is only a problem if the water contains elevated chlorides. That would prove contact with oil and gas waste. The Railroad Commission didn't say if it tested the water from this site. The company did not return calls from News 8, but a manager at the site showed us how standing rainwater was pumped into those same haulers. Once collected, it was then dropped into the trough with the fracking waste. The manager said there was never a breach in the earthen wall, but from Dunlap's property and inside the wall, one can clearly identify new gravel filling a gap in mud and grass. Dunlap has hired a private lab to test water samples on her property. "We know that creek goes into Joe Pool Lake, which is one of the main water sources for North Texas," she said. "I know I would not want to have that lake contaminated." Lab Tests may not reveal any contamination, but Dunlap wants to know what's in the water as long as it continues to flow through her pastures. E-mail cnorton@wfaa.com

Friday, January 24, 2014

Brains and Eggs: Keystone XL lets it flow

Brains and Eggs: Keystone XL lets it flow: It was declared dead , it came back to life .  Let's call it Zombie Pipeline . The Keystone XL Pipeline runs under Julia Trigg Crawf...

Wednesday, January 22, 2014

Brains and Eggs: Nobody likes Barry Smitherman

Brains and Eggs: Nobody likes Barry Smitherman: It's not just the residents of Azle and elsewhere in Frackland, but also the media and even a few Republicans.  Let's see what&#39...

Monday, January 13, 2014

Water! It's about Water and Education for Senate 9 Candidate

By Faith Chatham - Jan. 13, 2014
Gregory R. Perry is a quiet-spoken intelligent man. When asked why he is running for Texas Senate District 9, he replied: "Mainly Anger!"
When he begins talking about public policy and how it impacts his grandchildren, it becomes clear that Gregory R. Perry is determined to change the course of Texas public policy. Gregory is convinced that the trajectory of this state is at odds with the opportunities facing his grandchildren and their generations. Gregory R. Perry is a man with a purpose and he knows what must be done and is ready to get to work seeing that it gets done!
1. Education - "Without education no one is going anywhere!" Perry says that even highway funding is inconsequential if we do not educate our children. He is running in an urban district (Arlington,  Irving, Grand Prairie and the Mid-Cities) which has over 89,000 adults who have not graduated from High School.  Unopposed in the Democratic Primary, Gregory R. Perry is facing incumbent Kelly Hancock (R) in the General Election. Hancock voted to slash school funding in 2011 while in the Texas House. In the Senate he has done little or nothing to restore the funding or to strengthen the public education system in Texas. In the Senate, Hancock opposed Equal Pay for Equal Work for women.

2. Public Infrastructure - especially Water - For Gregory Perry it comes down to energy and water. The U.S. Government stopped building reservoirs in the 1980s. The Reagan administration tried to privatize building water reservoir. Perry, retired from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, specialized in water management and river engineering. He says that until the Reagan administration, the Army Corps of Engineers built three reservoirs per decade to keep up with water demands from population growth and expanded industrial usage. When Reagan tried to sell of the reservoirs and speculated that future reservoirs could be constructed by private corporations, they failed to factor in the impact of flood control and sovereignty.
Only the United States Government can claim sovereignty. When reservoirs have to open the floodgates in exercising flood control, the government can defend itself from law suits because of sovereignty. A private company cannot. Therefore, it is too big a risk for private corporations to invest in reservoirs. There is a water crisis in Texas and it will not get better. Deferring investment in water solutions -- long term investment in infrastructure is imperative for the quality of life and economic future of North Texans. Gregory R. Perry worked on the Joe Pool Lake, Lake of the Pines, Sam Rayburn, and Lake of the Pines Corps of Engineers water management projects. He understand water and he knows Texas aquifers. With the stress of trillions of gallons of water used by horizontal drilling/fracking in Texas during drought, water is a priority for this next legislative session. He has worked on the rivers and lakes of Texas and now Gregory R. Perry is prepared to bring solutions to the floor for consideration.

Commenting on the power plants which went off-line during the January cold spell, Perry explains that these plants are coal power plants and it takes longer for a coal plant to come on-line. Water powered power plants come on-line rapidly. However, in Texas we do not have the water to power new hydro powered plants.

We have to think ahead and be innovative and apply sustainable energy solutions throughout the state. "Fossil fuel is a limited resource. We must shift to renewable energy for powering our homes and businesses and save the petro chemicals for producing plastics." Perry sees the current use of fossil fuel as "squandering resources which are too precious to use on generating electricity."

3. Equal Pay for Equal Work - Gregory Perry says that failure to index the minimum wage to inflation has eroded the financial base of families and transferred costs to the government which should be included in the cost of business when making a profit. In Senate District 9, over 48% of the households in the district live on less than $50,000 a year.  About 45% of the households in the District are renters. The median gross rent is $850 a month. Transportation cost is high. The Texas Legislative Council estimates that 110,536 people were living in poverty in Senate District 9 in 2011 and the per capita income is estimated as $25,046. Gregory R. Perry believes all workers should be fairly compensated. Gender and racial workplace discrimination must stop. The percentage of Latino and African American workers are three times more likely to live in poverty than Anglo workers. Texas has a higher employment rate than many other states but 28.6% of Texas jobs are low-wage. Gregory R. Perry says that "Trickle-down economic is a dismal failure. Money flows to the top one percent and American jobs have gone off-shore. Money hasn't trickled down to the middle class. The earning of many of the middle class is now below the poverty level." Gregory Perry cites a 2011 U.S. Census Bureau report that the number of families living in poverty in the United States is now at the highest level in 50 years.



Perry sees education as the big divide between economic stability and opportunity.  The Texas Legislative Council reports 26.6% of the adults in Senate District 9 have Bachelor's Degrees or higher. However, 18.1% of the adults 25 years and older do not have high school diplomas. Many of the 45.8% of the district which have graduated from High School have difficulty affording a college education. In 2011 only 45,613 persons in the district were in college, attending university or trade schools. Gregory R. Perry says that lack of education combined with racial and gender discrimination in pay rates and job opportunities impacts the poverty level in the district. When families earn less, they have less to spend. This impacts the retail, housing and wholesale sectors of the district and impacts the overall economics of the region.

Gregory R. Perry does not think in sound-bites. He thinks like an engineer who is interested in macro economics. He views the big picture and looks for short-term solutions as a bridge while  long-term investments can be implemented to prevent future problems.

I found the conversations with Mr. Perry very stimulating. He does not duck and hide from the difficult questions. He is a family man who thinks of the future instead of just trying to put a band-aide on current problems. I find him refreshingly honest and intelligent. He is not a politician. He's neither polished nor evasive! He does have a plan and he has purpose. I like him. He is worth giving serious consideration for replacing the current incumbent in Senate District 9. Visit his website at www.txsen9gregoryperry.com
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/groups/GregoryRPerrySen9/ Google+: https://plus.google.com/114868630917640358013

Monday, December 9, 2013

Cross-border pollution - Eastern States Press Midwest to Improve Air

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/12/09/us/politics/eastern-states-press-midwest-to-improve-air.html?smid=pl-share

WASHINGTON — In a battle that pits the East Coast against the Midwest over the winds that carry dirty air from coal plants, the governors of eight Northeastern states plan to petition theEnvironmental Protection Agency on Monday to force tighter air pollution regulations on nine Rust Belt and Appalachian states.
The East Coast states, including New York and Connecticut, have for more than 15 years been subject to stricter air pollution requirements than many other parts of the country. Their governors have long criticized the Appalachian and Rust Belt states, including Ohio, Kentucky and Michigan, for their more lenient rules on pollution from coal-fired power plants, factories and tailpipes — allowing those economies to profit from cheap energy while their belched soot and smog are carried on the prevailing winds that blow across the United States.
All the governors on the petition are Democrats. Gov. Chris Christie of New Jersey, a Republican and a potential presidential candidate in 2016, has not signed it.
The petition comes the day before the Supreme Court is to hear arguments to determine the fate of a related E.P.A. regulation known as the “good neighbor” rule. The regulation, officially called the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule, would force states with coal pollution that wafts across state lines to rein in soot and smog, either by installing costly pollution control technology or by shutting the power plants.
Even if the regulation is upheld, the Eastern governors are seeking stronger constraints on pollution from the Midwest and Rust Belt states.
The Obama administration issued the “good neighbor” rule, which would apply chiefly to power plants in 27 states east of Nebraska, half of the country, in 2011, but the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit struck it down, ruling that the E.P.A. had not followed the Clean Air Act when it calculated how to assign responsibility for cross-state air pollution. The rule is part of President Obama’s growing effort to use E.P.A. regulations to crack down on coal pollution.
In the case before the Supreme Court, the E.P.A. argues that the cross-state air rule, which it is required to issue under the Clean Air Act of 1990, is necessary to protect the health and environment of downwind states. The utilities and 15 states on the other side argue that the rule, as written by the Obama administration E.P.A., gives the agency too much regulatory authority and places an unfair economic burden on the states.

Sunday, December 8, 2013


Travel to other worlds ... UTA Planetarium

Immersive full-dome 3-D Digital planetarium show narrated by Ewan McGregor (Obi wan Kepobi from Star Wars) - Astronaut takes you exporing the worlds of inner and outer space. The movie is projected all around you. You recline in specially constructed chairs which enables you to comfortably view the immersive full-dome planetarium show. Astronaut! (produced from the National Space Centre in England) goes beyond the stereotypical space movie. Experience a rocket launch from inside the body of the astronaut. Float around the international Space Station moving thorugh the microscopic regions of the human body! Discover the beauty and perils as "Chad", the test astronaut experiences everything thrown at him.




Summer Schedule (June 2-August 26):

Astronaut!


shows at the UTA Planetarium.


Wed. through Saturdays at 11 a.m.
and Thursday at 7:00 p.m.




Cosmic CSI

shows at the UTA Planetarium 3-D Digital Dome.


Wed. through Saturdays at 2 p.m.




Rock Hall of Fame 1 (The Original)


shows at the UTA Planetarium.


Thursday at 8:00 p.m.




Read more (Warning their flat dull website doesn't give much of a glimmer of the multi-dimensional experience you'll have once you enter the dome of the UTA Planetarium!)


Admission: Adults: $5.00


Seniors, Students, Children: $4.00


UTA Faculty, Staff & Alumni (with ID): $3.00


UTA Studens (with ID): $2.00


Groups of 10 or more with reservation: $3.00


Call 817 272-1183 or e-mail planetarium@uta.edu